During the extra analyses we looked the partnership anywhere between participants’ baseline risk/danger sign peak and their utilization of the system (Table 3)

During the extra analyses we looked the partnership anywhere between participants’ baseline risk/danger sign peak and their utilization of the system (Table 3)

The results show that baseline characteristics were only loosely correlated with the number of logins, completed monitoring assessments, page hits, and forum visits, while stronger associations were found with the more intense parts of the intervention (forum posts and chat participations). In addition, age was correlated with utilization between rspearman=.17 (age ? logins) and rspearman=.25 (age ? forum visits; all p < .01). 1.

All of the correlations off Bmi with use was basically less than

All of the correlations regarding Body mass index with use was basically below

The correlations away from Body mass index with usage was basically lower than

Every correlations off Bmi with application was basically below

All of the correlations from Bmi that have usage was basically lower than

Most of the correlations of Bmi which have application was indeed less than

All the correlations of Bmi having use were lower than

Every correlations of Body mass index having usage was basically lower than

All the correlations out of Body mass index which have application was basically below

All correlations regarding Body mass index with utilization was basically less than

Most of the correlations regarding Bmi having usage was indeed below

All the correlations out of Body mass index with usage was basically less than

Every correlations from Bmi having utilization had been less than

The correlations from Body mass index having use have been less than

Most of the correlations off Bmi which have usage was basically lower than

Most of the correlations off Bmi having usage was lower than

Every correlations from Body mass index which have application have been below

Total(Letter = step 3,548) School(Letter = 2,739) On the internet connect(N = 255) Necessary because of the pal(N = 141) Flyer/poster(N = 118) Most other (N = 295) Sample statistics p
Note. Logins = quantity of logins so you’re able to ProYouth; Monitorings = amount of done overseeing questionnaires; Forum postings = number of efforts towards forum; Chats = involvement during the on the web guidance cam lesson (class or individual); Page hits = quantity of profiles reached in the participant town (i. age., just after login); Message board visits = amount of users reached on the forum (we. age., immediately following log in); IQR= inter quartile Assortment; * = average attempt.
Logins* M (Md [IQR]) step 3.9 (0 [0–1]) step one.step 3 (step 1 [0–1]) 13.4 (2 [1–5]) 20.cuatro (step one [1–3]) 6.dos (step 1 [0–3]) 11.3 (step one [0–4]) ?2(4) = 327.six <.001
Monitorings* Meters (Md [IQR]) step one.step 3 (0 [0–1]) 0.eight (0 (0–0]) step 3.nine (step one [0–3]) 2.6 (0 [0–2]) 2.5 (0 [0–2]) 3.seven (step 1 [0–3]) ?2(4) = 308.six <.001
Community forum postings % 3.step 3 1.4 eleven.cuatro 9.9 5.step one 10.2 ?2(4) = 150.dos <.001
Chats % 3.0 1.step 1 10.dos 11.4 8.5 seven.8 ?2(4) = 150.eight <.001
Web page strikes* Yards (Md [IQR]) 34.1 (cuatro [0–15]) several.8 (2 [0–11]) 129.seven (19 [2–53]) 116.0 (thirteen [3–34]) 63.cuatro (11 [0–28]) 98.8 (fifteen [0–39]) ?2(4) = 223.six <.001
Community forum visits* Yards (Md [IQR]) 5.5 (0 [0–0]) 1.step one (0 [0–0]) 21.2 (step 1 [0–7]) twenty seven.cuatro (0 [0–3]) 8.9 (0 [0–2]) 21.0 (0 [0–3]) ?2(4) = 585.2 <.001
Intercourse WCS > 57 Binge eating Laxatives Illness Low-fat restaurants Do so Bingeing and you can illness Previous texas
Note. Logins = number of logins to ProYouth; Monitorings = number of completed monitoring questionnaires; Forum postings = number of contributions to the forum; Chats = participation in online counseling chat session (group or individual); Webpage strikes = number of pages accessed in the participant area (i. e., after login); Community forum check outs = number of pages accessed in the forum (i. e., after login); WCS = Weight Concerns Scale; tx = treatment; OR = odds ratio; rspearman = Spearman rank correlations; CI = confidence interval; **p <. 01.
Logins rspearman .18** .21** .13** .04** .14** jak usunД…Д‡ konto naughtydate.15** .00 .14** .14**
Monitorings rspearman .23** .22** .13** .07** .14** .17** .02 .17** .14**
Page hits rspearman .17** .21** .14** .05** .14** .14** .00 .14** .15**
Forum visits rspearman .18** .25** .17** .13** .20** .19** .01 .20** .23**
Forum posts Or [CI] 4.3 [dos.3–8.1] 5.3 [step 3.6–7.9] 2.eight [step 1.9–cuatro.0] 3.seven [2.2–6.1] 4.step 3 [dos.9–6.4] step three.8 [2.5–5.7] step 1.2 [0.8–step one.7] Or = step 3.8 [2.5–5.8] Or = 5.step 3 [3.5–8.0]
Chats Or [CI] 47.seven [6.6–341] ten.6 [six.5–17.1] step three.8 [dos.5–5.7] dos.6 [1.5–cuatro.7] 5.4 [step three.6–8.2] 7.5 [cuatro.6–12.4] step one.cuatro [step one.0–dos.1] Otherwise = cuatro.6 [3.0–eight.1] Or = dos.nine [step one.8–cuatro.7]

Dejar un comentario

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada. Los campos obligatorios están marcados con *